Making Tailwind JIT work with Hugo

What to do until Tailwind CSS’s JIT mode works OoTB with Hugo.


Update from the future: In 2023, the release of Hugo 0.112.0 finally (?) resolved this issue.

General note: This site’s appearance, configuration, hosting, and other basic considerations will change over time. As a result, certain content on this page could be at variance with what you’re currently seeing on the site, but the two were consistent when this post originally appeared.

Earlier this year, the announcement of Tailwind CSS’s just-in-time (JIT) mode was followed closely by the subsequent and deflating word that this cool feature wouldn’t work with the Hugo static site generator (SSG). The Hugo team immediately started trying to fix that issue but, as of this writing, still hasn’t been able to deliver a solution.

In the ensuing months, some Tailwind aficionados among Hugo users latched onto a snappy workaround devised by a member of the Hugo user community. While this clever end run proved effective, the description its inventor provided was lacking in some details. As a result, I encountered difficulty in using it with any but the most basic Hugo repos. In other words, adding it to an existing repo, especially one with a certain degree of build complexity, was daunting.

This post describes how I finally remedied that.

Within, I’ll cover:

  • The problem, or why Tailwind JIT normally doesn’t work with Hugo
  • The workaround for this problem
  • The remaining issues involved and how I (think I) solved them

Tailwind JIT and Hugo: the problem

Within hours after the announcement of Tailwind JIT, reports of trouble came into the Hugo Discourse forum and the special Tailwind JIT repo. (While users of other apps reported issues, I’ll concentrate here on the effects seen in Hugo.)

If one had a Hugo project where Tailwind had been working fine and then set it to enable JIT, Hugo would either hang up during the development process or error out, often with a message that began with Error: ENOENT: no such file or directory, stat and complained about the absence of a stdin file. (More on that specific error shortly.)1

To his great credit, Bjørn Erik Pedersen, Hugo’s chief developer, immediately realized the significance of making the popular Tailwind framework’s hottest new feature fully available from within Hugo, and began working to implement a fix. However, as the months have gone by, that fix has slipped from one Hugo version “milestone” to another — from 0.82 to 0.89 as of this post’s initial publication.

Now, let me backtrack briefly to that stdin-specific error message I mentioned above, because it relates to the proposed fixes I’m about to discuss. Five months after JIT-related SNAFUs became a thing, GitHub user ENT8R proposed this explanation within the “Issues” section of the jekyll-postcss plugin’s GitHub repo:

I think the issue is that this plugin passes a string with “stdin” to the PostCSS configuration. While this might be true for this plugin, Tailwind assumes that this parameter is an existing file to check for modifications to run the JIT engine, which leads to this error. This error is likely triggered by Tailwind making use of fs.statSync(decodeURIComponent(pathname)).mtimeMs where specifically fs.statSync(decodeURIComponent("stdin")).mtimeMs leads to the error messages . . . if there is no file called “stdin” in the current working directory.

In short: the conventional and even Tailwind-recommended method of using Tailwind — wielding it chiefly through PostCSS — wasn’t playing nicely with PostCSS due to this stdin-related problem. Understanding that is important for getting your mind around where we’re going below.

Workaround efforts

Multiple Hugo users have proposed workarounds for the issue while waiting for a resolution from Pedersen and his fellow maintainers. In my casual observation of Hugo Discourse traffic concerning these suggestions, the one that seems to have gained the most traction was described in Praveen Juge’s “Use Tailwind JIT with Hugo” post. It was accompanied by his hugo-tailwind-jit repo.

In essence, Juge’s workaround involved using the Tailwind command line interface (CLI), called directly from within a project’s node_modules structure, to do all the usual Tailwind JIT things without invoking the PostCSS CLI, and thus without causing Hugo any problems. If we can assume ENT8R was correct in blaming the glitch on the interaction between PostCSS and Tailwind JIT, Juge’s suggestion was a logical fix.

However, there was still more to do.

You see, Juge’s post described, and his repo included, a bare-bones Hugo/Tailwind project. The content didn’t explain how to make Tailwind JIT work with existing Hugo projects, such as several I had, which included bespoke CSS rules and files in addition to those specific to Tailwind CSS. When I tried to convert those projects to use Juge’s workaround, I kept running into certain odd glitches.

Here’s one such weird thing I encountered, just so you can get the picture. In my Eleventy-based/JIT-using repo, I’d used the following file2 along with the postcss-import plugin to combine Tailwind’s CSS with my own:


@import 'reset.css';
@import 'prismjs.css';
@import 'tailwindcss/base';
@import 'global.css';
@import 'utility.css';
@import 'tables.css';
@import 'footnotes.css';
@import 'nav.css';
@import 'lazyload.css';
@import 'lite-yt-embed.css';
@import 'tailwindcss/components';
@import 'tailwindcss/utilities';

But that approach, or anything remotely like it, just wouldn’t fly in the workaround-equipped Hugo repo. Essentially, either (a.) Hugo couldn’t get past the Tailwind-related part of the package.json scripts or (b.) Tailwind would ignore anything after the @import 'tailwindcss/base'; statement. Either way, I was hosed.

A few nights ago, I began to give it another try, and decided that this time I would stay with it until I’d wrestled the SOB to the mat. Having done so with only a little huffing and puffing, I’ll now tell you how I made it work.

Filling in the gaps

Here are the key points I discovered.

Assimilation rather than importation

Using the Tailwind CLI in this way apparently requires using @tailwind directives (which is optional if you use Tailwind through PostCSS). This precludes a fully successful use of @import statements in one’s CSS, even with postcss-import installed. Yes, you’re still using PostCSS; you’re just not running Tailwind through its postcss.config.js file.

As noted above, the Tailwind CLI ignores any @imports after you bring in any of the Tailwind CSS rules.3 Instead, you have to make sure that any bespoke CSS which follows the Tailwind CSS will be within layers for the Tailwind base, utilities, and components CSS files.

When I (finally) figured out this part, I moved the vast majority of my bespoke CSS rules from separate files into one file, tw.css, with the tailwind directive and several @layer directives. It begins as follows:

/* tw.css */
@import '/assets/css/reset.css';
@import '/assets/css/chroma_native_tweaked.css';
@import '/assets/css/chroma_fix-all.css';
@tailwind base;
@tailwind components;
@tailwind utilities;

@layer base {
	/* ============================
	START, from original global.css
	============================= */
	html {
		scroll-padding-top: 80px;

. . . and so on down the line. The @imported files above the first @tailwind statement do, indeed, get into the final CSS file. Again, anything @imported after that won’t, so that’s why @layer is the way to go.4

Making it work with Hugo Pipes

In pre-JIT times, the project in question used Hugo Pipes to process the resulting CSS for fingerprinting and compression with the following statements in the head.html partial:

<!-- CSS from PostCSS -->
{{ $css := resources.Get "css/index.css" }}
{{ $css := $css | resources.PostCSS (dict "outputStyle" "compressed") | fingerprint }}

That had worked just fine when the package.json scripting looked like this:

"clean": "rm -rf public",
"start": "npm-run-all clean --parallel dev:*",
"dev:hugo": "hugo server",
"build": "NODE_ENV=production npm-run-all clean --parallel prod:*",
"prod:hugo": "hugo --gc --minify"

. . . because, back then, PostCSS (not the Tailwind CLI) was taking the aforementioned @import-laden CSS, converting it as needed, and then letting Hugo Pipes finish the job.

It didn’t take too many failures for me to see that using the Tailwind CLI way wasn’t going to mesh with such a procedure. The main issue was that the Hugo Pipes stuff in head.html would fail because, at that point in the process, there wasn’t yet an index.css file for it to process.

Here’s the package.json scripting that finally did work.5

"clean": "rimraf public && rimraf ./assets/css/index/css",
"start": "TAILWIND_MODE=watch NODE_ENV=development npm-run-all clean prelim:twcss --parallel dev:*",
"build": "NODE_ENV=production npm-run-all clean prelim:twcss prod:*",
"prelim:twcss": "./node_modules/tailwindcss/lib/cli.js -i ./assets/css/tw.css -o ./assets/css/index.css --jit",
"dev:twcssw": "./node_modules/tailwindcss/lib/cli.js -i ./assets/css/tw.css -o ./assets/css/index.css --jit -w",
"dev:hugo": "hugo server",
"prod:twcss": "./node_modules/tailwindcss/lib/cli.js -i ./assets/css/tw.css -o ./assets/css/index.css --jit --minify",
"prod:hugo": "hugo --gc --minify"

As for what’s happening therein:

  1. I initially tried what had worked in the PostCSS-based scripting. That was the use of the same index.css file for both input (-i) and output (-o). However, that produced unsatisfactory results with the Tailwind CLI. Consequently, I set this up with tw.css as the input file and index.css as a separate output file. I then added the index.css file to the project’s .gitignore file since there was no point in tracking this continually changing, dynamically generated file.
  2. In both development and production, the prelim:twcss script runs the Tailwind JIT process first, to create an initial version of index.css before Hugo Pipes can start working with it. This avoids the “I can’t find index.css, so I quit” problem.
  3. In development (start), dev:twcss and dev:hugo run simultaneously, with the former “watching” the CSS and the latter “watching” pretty much everything else.
  4. In production (build), prod:twcss and prod:hugo act like their dev counterparts except, of course, that there’s no “watching” happening.

With Hugo Pipes thus always given an index.css file to process, we can easily handle that part in head.html:

{{ $css := resources.Get "css/index.css" | resources.PostCSS | fingerprint "md5" }}
<link rel="preload" as="style" href="{{ $css.RelPermalink }}">
<link rel="stylesheet" href="{{ $css.RelPermalink }}" type="text/css">

There’s no minifying done here, this time, because we already did that for the CSS with the Tailwind CLI’s --minify flag.

A wrap-up on the workaround

I’ve noted in recent months that I was disappointed with three particular dearths on Hugo’s part. The first two dealt with styling: (1.) updated Sass support; and (2.) Tailwind JIT support. This workaround eliminates (2.) and, truth be known, kinda makes me not care so much, now, about (1.).6 Until there’s a truly official resolution to the conflict between Hugo and Tailwind JIT, I’ve found the setup described herein to be perfectly acceptable.

As always, I hope this info helps. While I don’t claim in any way to be an authority on this admittedly nerdy stuff, I will be glad to take any questions you may have about it.

Update from the future: This post was about integrating Hugo and Tailwind CSS 2.x, the current version when the post was initially issued. For information on using Hugo with Tailwind CSS 3.x, see my later post, “Making Tailwind JIT work with Hugo, the Version 3 edition.”

  1. While many of the reports related to certain projects’ use of directories with spaces in their names, the problems weren’t limited to just those. I, for one, had show-stopping issues with JIT-enabled Hugo repos even though I never use spaces in the names of any of my projects’ directories or files. ↩︎

  2. I’ve edited it slightly for easier reading, especially to remove things I’d commented out or which actually weren’t of use (e.g., purgecss-related statements, which Tailwind JIT rendered pointless). ↩︎

  3. And, in any event, postcss-import itself won’t accept @imports coming after non-@imports, so it’s essentially a moot subject when @tailwind rules are required, as they seem to be with the Tailwind CLI. ↩︎

  4. For web font users, I should note that the use of the Inter variable font is more complicated to configure in this setup compared to a Tailwind JIT setup that doesn’t involve the workaround. This is because one Inter variable font file serves for both regular and italic/oblique styles, and it takes some extra CSS to make that work correctly with Firefox and Safari where italics/obliques are concerned (Chromium-based browsers have no problem with it). The placement of that CSS can be problematic in this particular setup. I’ve made it work, but it’s tricky: basically, I put the CSS for the Inter font file before the @import statements and the Firefox- and Safari-specific CSS after all the @layer statements. YMMV, as is so often true for CSS. ↩︎

  5. I substituted the rimraf package for rm -rf to provide greater cross-platform compatibility. ↩︎

  6. The third area where I find Hugo currently lacking isn’t the fault of the Hugo maintainers but, rather, goes back to an ongoing shortcoming of the goldmark parser for Markdown. On a separate subject: the Astro folks are now eying goldmark for their purposes, but I’ve made them aware of this issue and, indeed, one of their devs is going to try fixing it since the goldmark maintainer has explained that he needs help with a solution. Update, 2022-03-02: This issue was resolved on February 28, 2022, with the release of Hugo 0.93.0. It included the first goldmark version, 1.4.7, with the code from a pull request that fixed all the cases I’d reported. ↩︎

Reply via email
View comments