Hugo via npm?

Using a Node.js package to install and run Hugo may sound strange at first, but it has clear merits.


Note: This post also appears on

During my years of using the Hugo static site generator (SSG), I’ve occasionally seen mentions about how you could install, and even run, Hugo’s Go-based binary by using one or more JavaScript packages sourced via npm. Having long ago understood the usual, very un-npm-ish Hugo methods for installation — much less the un-npm-ish nature of Hugo use in general — I never bothered looking into these JS-based alternatives. Besides, I figured, how could they even work? And, if they did, in what use cases did they make more sense than normal Hugo use?

But, yesterday, I began to grasp a bigger picture.

The point, and it does have one . . .

While I was helping someone resolve an apparent problem with his own Hugo site, I saw that his chosen theme installed and employed Hugo through just such an approach. In this case, the npm package was Hugo Installer, created and maintained by Dominique Müller.

My usual reaction, bordering on disdain, soon gave way to my oft-cited nerdy curiosity, although I still had the same primary questions from those earlier encounters with references to an npm-style way to handle Hugo. Then, as I read up on Hugo Installer and how it was used in a variety of sites and themes, I started to get the point.

Like the more venerable, more popular, but (in my opinion) less suitable hugo-bin, Hugo Installer makes it easier to manage Hugo use in projects already making thorough use of Node.js packages — which seems to describe a huge majority of the website projects you’ll find on places like GitHub and GitLab:

  • If cloning/forking a project, one usually does a simple npm install to get all the goodies needed to make the project run either locally or on a remote host.
  • In a multi-developer project, it’s important to keep everyone’s tools on the same versions through use of package.json.
  • On the other hand, it’s sometimes necessary for separate projects on the same machine, or within a team’s machines, to use different versions of one or more tools. For example, a dev or dev team might inherit a project that, for whatever reason, goes belly-up unless used with an older version of a specific tool.1

Now, with Hugo Installer and appropriate scripting onboard, even a Hugo project can meet these requirements just as well as can a project anchored by a JS-based SSG.

How it works

When run from a package.json script, Hugo Installer checks for the presence of a Hugo binary — by default, in the project’s bin/ folder, although you can pick a different location — and, only if it doesn’t find the binary, downloads and installs a version, which you must specify. The check goes very quickly and, thus, I suggest you make a package.json script that does only the Hugo Installer part, and use it with your other Hugo-related scripts. Here are some examples, some of which use Müller’s exec-bin package so the installed Hugo binary will run as you would expect:

	"name": "my-project",
	"description": "TBD",
	"config": {
		"hugo": "0.110.0"
	"scripts": {
		"install:hugo": "hugo-installer --version $npm_package_config_hugo --extended",
		"dev:hugo": "npm run install:hugo && exec-bin bin/hugo/hugo server",
		"prod:hugo": "npm run install:hugo && exec-bin bin/hugo/hugo --minify",

You’ll note my use of a config object, in which I provide the desired Hugo version. This allows me a clear, easily identified place to change that spec at a moment’s notice whenever I wish. Down in the install:hugo script, I call back to that specification by using $npm_package_config_hugo.2 By the way: while that works fine (and I have other purposes for using $npm_package_, anyway), Hugo Installer also lets you do this, given what’s shown above for that config object:

"install:hugo": "hugo-installer --version config.hugo --extended",

Any sour points?

Earlier, I cited this method’s advantages vs. “normal” Hugo. But are there comparative disadvantages?

In my use so far, I’ve noticed only one: for anything you’d have normally done through a hugo command from the terminal, you’ll have to change it to a script within the given project’s package.json. Let’s say you want to recreate the hugo new command for starting a new post, e.g.:

hugo new posts/2023/02/my-next-post/

In a project using Hugo Installer, you’d need a package.json script like this:

"hugonew": "exec-bin bin/hugo/hugo new",

Once you have that, the previous example would become:

npm run hugonew posts/2023/02/my-next-post/

. . . which is hardly worth mentioning where one’s muscle memory is concerned. However, if you typically use a lot of hugo commands and thus would have to make a package.json script for each, you’ll probably have a much different opinion about the whole thing.3

Anyway, there you have it: a totally different way of installing and using Hugo.

This month, I took the site squarely into npm-ville when I brought in the npm version of Sass and added PostCSS to make “future” CSS work with current browsers. As it turns out, those changes made my site an unexpectedly appropriate target for the use case that Hugo Installer presents. I’m sure I’ll find nits to pick over time but, for now, I’m impressed by what I’ve seen.

  1. Where Hugo is concerned, one possible scenario of this type would be if a project required the Blackfriday Markdown parser, Hugo’s support for which ended with the release of Hugo 0.87.0 in August, 2021. For that matter, Hugo began transitioning away from Blackfriday with Hugo 0.60.0 (November, 2019), when goldmark became Hugo’s default Markdown library. ↩︎

  2. I encourage you to read Brian Childress’s 2018 article, “Variables in package.json,” which was a great help in this aspect of the changeover. ↩︎

  3. One other thing to keep in mind is that, if you already have a more conventional Hugo installation on your machine, especially a global installation, you’ll probably want to uninstall it before trying this method. Otherwise, you might not know whether Hugo Installer is working properly, because your machine may — and likely will — be using its previously installed Hugo version rather than the one you’re trying to install and use. But, if you have multiple Hugo projects on the machine, you’ll then have to use Hugo Installer with all of them, and only you can decide is it’s worth it. ↩︎

Reply via email
View comments